The expert group is agonizing on a specific issue. We need your feedback. Should getters be considered regular methods and thus be validated when called?
The problem
Existing applications put Bean Validation constraints on properties (ie getters). If we enable validations when getters are called, some applications might fail and Bean Validation would not be backward compatible. Besides, it is unlikely that you want to validate genuine getters when they are called. These are state, not operations for the most part.
First off what does it mean to be a getter. A method is a getter if:
- its name starts with
is
, has no parameter and its return type isBoolean
- or its name starts with
get
and has not parameter
If in your service (say a CDI bean), you have an action method with
no parameter and starting with get
, and if you have added constraints
to validate the return value upon method call, we cannot differentiate
this action method from a genuine getter.
We have several solutions to work around the problem and we would like to know which one you prefer.
Solutions
We can use a few levers to work around the issue:
- ask you to enable method validation explicitly
- offer a coarse or fine grained solution to change the default behavior
Solution 1: enable method validation out of the box
If method validation is enabled out of the box then the sensible default is to exclude getters from method validation.
This approach is friendly out of the box and will work as expected most of
the time (except for action methods with no parameter, starting with get
and with constraints on the return value).
The downside of this approach is that in this very specific case where an action method is also a getter, method validation would be disabled out of the box and a manual intervention would be necessary.
You can change the default approach in two ways:
Solution 1.a: global flag
Use a global flag to disable method validation entirely or ask for getters
to be validated upon call. You would use validation.xml
for that:
<method-validation mode="INCLUDE_GETTERS"/>
There is no way to change the behavior for a specific (set of) class.
Solution 1.b: fine grained flag
An alternative solution is to change method validation behavior in a much more fine-grained approach:
- set the default approach globally
in
validation.xml
- set or override the setting for a given package (including sub-packages?)
via
@ValidateOnCall
as a package annotation (orvalidation.xml
) - set or override the setting for a given class
via
@ValidateOnCall
as a type annotation (orvalidation.xml
) - set or override the setting for a given method
via
@ValidateOnCall
as a method annotation (orvalidation.xml
)
A @ValidateOnCall
annotation can be overridden in validation.xml
like we do for
constraints declarations.
public class AwesomeService {
// not a getter - validated by default
@NotNull Currency provideMainCurrency(@ISO @NotNull String country) { ... }
// not a getter - validated by default
@NotNull Currency getAlternativeCurrencies(@ISO @NotNull String country) { ... }
// getter - must use @ValidateOnCall to activate
@ValidateOnCall(mode=INCLUDE_GETTERS)
@NotNull getAllCurrencies() { ... }
}
Note that, we could put @ValidateOnCall(mode=INCLUDE_GETTERS)
on the package
of service classes
@ValidateOnCall(mode=INCLUDE_GETTERS)
package com.acme.gladiator.action;
In this case, getAllCurrencies()
does not need to be annotated with @ValidateOnCall
.
Solution 2: disable method validation out of the box
In this situation, a user wanting to enable method validation needs to both:
- add the constraints on methods
- add the flag to enable method validation
The method validation flag would both allow it to be enabled and decide if getters should be considered.
This approach is the least surprise approach as nothing is happening that you have not explicitly asked for. The drawback is that it requires a manual intervention to enable method validation in a given archive which is not groovy.
Solution 2.a: global flag
For all archives using method validation, a META-INF/validation.xml
file must
be added. The file would contain the explicit setting:
<method-validation mode="INCLUDE_GETTER"/>
There is no way to change the behavior for a specific (set of) classes.
Solution 2.b: fine grained flag
As described in the previous section, we could enable method validation at
the package, class and method level using either a @ValidateOnCall
annotation
or via the validation.xml
. In this approach, validation.xml
is not mandatory
to enable method validation provided that you use @ValidateOnCall
in your code.
So what's your favorite?
My personal favorite is to enable non-getter method validation out of the box and offer fine-grained options to override the behavior. That's solution 1.b. My reasoning is the following:
- I want ease of use and method validation enabled by default
- actions methods named like a getter, with no parameter and constraints on its return value will be rare - return value constraint are less common than parameter methods
Some in the expert group do prefer solution 2.a or 2.b.
What's your take? And why do you prefer this approach?